<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 things eMail marketers need to know about bill C-27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/email-marketing-tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email marketing buzz, future social inbox, spam clicking cats, getting feedback and premission marketing &#124; The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-11795</link>
		<dc:creator>Email marketing buzz, future social inbox, spam clicking cats, getting feedback and premission marketing &#124; The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-11795</guid>
		<description>[...] CAUCE.org contacted the government regarding the status of the Electronic Commerce Protection Act (Bill C-27) earlier this month. The reply they got seems to be quite clear that this legislation (which died [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CAUCE.org contacted the government regarding the status of the Electronic Commerce Protection Act (Bill C-27) earlier this month. The reply they got seems to be quite clear that this legislation (which died [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian anti-spam bill (C-27) killed by prorogation &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10199</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian anti-spam bill (C-27) killed by prorogation &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10199</guid>
		<description>[...] any bills which did not have royal assent are dead and will need to start the process over &#8212; Canada&#8217;s anti-spam bill (C-27) is one of those casualties. Of course there&#8217;s lots of speculation as to why the PM wants to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any bills which did not have royal assent are dead and will need to start the process over &#8212; Canada&#8217;s anti-spam bill (C-27) is one of those casualties. Of course there&#8217;s lots of speculation as to why the PM wants to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 posts of 2009 &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 posts of 2009 &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10198</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 things marketers need to know about bill C-27 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 things marketers need to know about bill C-27 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google top news for eMail marketing 12-16-2009 &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10197</link>
		<dc:creator>Google top news for eMail marketing 12-16-2009 &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10197</guid>
		<description>[...] lead today’s Google news for eMail marketing with an update on Canada’s bill C-27. C-27 (Electronic Commerce Protection Act), which in part is intended to control spam eMail has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lead today’s Google news for eMail marketing with an update on Canada’s bill C-27. C-27 (Electronic Commerce Protection Act), which in part is intended to control spam eMail has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-27 Canadian anti-spam bill gets 2nd Senate reading Thursday &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>C-27 Canadian anti-spam bill gets 2nd Senate reading Thursday &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 things eMail marketers need to know about bill C-27 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 things eMail marketers need to know about bill C-27 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMail Marketing Glossary &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10193</link>
		<dc:creator>eMail Marketing Glossary &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10193</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian ecommerce bill similar to the U.S. CAN-SPAM act. The bill is comprehensive, wide reaching and and eMail marketers must be compliant with the new law which is expected to be passed by the end of 2009 &#8211; more info here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian ecommerce bill similar to the U.S. CAN-SPAM act. The bill is comprehensive, wide reaching and and eMail marketers must be compliant with the new law which is expected to be passed by the end of 2009 &#8211; more info here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill C-27: CRM expert concerned Canadian eMail marketers not ready &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill C-27: CRM expert concerned Canadian eMail marketers not ready &#124; # The eMail Guide - The search engine for eMail marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10192</guid>
		<description>[...] recently made this comment to Jim Ducharme (editor of The eMail Guide), who recently posted his “5 Things Marketers Need to Know” here at the eMail Guide.  Jim replied with a couple of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently made this comment to Jim Ducharme (editor of The eMail Guide), who recently posted his “5 Things Marketers Need to Know” here at the eMail Guide.  Jim replied with a couple of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ducharme</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-/#comment-10195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ducharme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10195</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for your comment! I should have worded that much differently. You are absolutely right and I have revised the post. Thanks for keeping me on my toes!

Regards,
jd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment! I should have worded that much differently. You are absolutely right and I have revised the post. Thanks for keeping me on my toes!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
jd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Rushing</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10194</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Rushing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10194</guid>
		<description>You refer to a &quot;grace period ... increased to two years from the time the bill goes into law&quot;.  Are you referring to the concept of &quot;implied consent&quot; that is defined as a two year period since the last &quot;business interaction&quot;.  Yours is the first place I&#039;ve seen this referred to as &quot;two years from the time the bill goes into law&quot; as opposed to two years since a business relationship existe.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You refer to a &#8220;grace period &#8230; increased to two years from the time the bill goes into law&#8221;.  Are you referring to the concept of &#8220;implied consent&#8221; that is defined as a two year period since the last &#8220;business interaction&#8221;.  Yours is the first place I&#8217;ve seen this referred to as &#8220;two years from the time the bill goes into law&#8221; as opposed to two years since a business relationship existe.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of the Blogosphere: Are You Ready?</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/tips-and-tricks/5-things-email-marketers-need-to-know-about-bill-c-27/comment-page-1/#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of the Blogosphere: Are You Ready?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailguide.com/blog/?p=2834#comment-10200</guid>
		<description>[...] kick things off, The Email Guide provided a download of the 5 things email marketers mailing to Canadian subscribers need to know about Bill C-27. Al Iverson provided his take on why the bill could be a very good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kick things off, The Email Guide provided a download of the 5 things email marketers mailing to Canadian subscribers need to know about Bill C-27. Al Iverson provided his take on why the bill could be a very good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

