It’s not email! That’s according to Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg as he announced Facebook’s new “messaging” application today. Unified messaging isn’t a new idea, others have failed with this in the past, but they didn’t have Facebook’s huge client base to roll it out to either.
He also made the case that this is not an email killer as has been claimed in some media hype, but he did suggest that it may well be the better way for younger people who are more accustomed to “real time” communications.
The basic goal is to make communications via this platform feel like a conversation and a no-brainer.
Right now it’s doesn’t support IMAP, but Facebook does plan to support that standard email protocol.
The new feature will start rolling out as invite only over the next few weeks.
You can request an invite from Facebook here!
The new service has 3 key features:
Seamless Messaging
The idea here is for people only to have to worry about the message and who they are sending it to. In other words, it doesn’t matter if the message is via SMS, email or IM — the platform doesn’t matter on the Facebook service.
Conversation History
Threading is confusing for most according to Facebook. Their idea is to sort messages as conversations between people so that you end up with a history of each of those conversations. Consider it a log book or even a e-scrapbook of your interactions.
Social Inbox
This is basically filtering depending on your choices — allowing you to organize your preferred or priority messages. This might sound familiar to Gmail’s Priority Inbox but, it’s true when Facebook makes the claim that they do have some more behavioral tracking data which makes the filtering that much more powerful and personal.
So what’s my take on all this?
It’s another way for them to open up more doors to advertisers to market to their membership. I appreciate the fact that Facebook wants to portray this as a noble attempt to make it easier to connect and communicate with friends. However, I believe this came out of that basic need to monetize Facebook and you do that by opening channels you can sell to potential advertisers. Sure they want to make the world a smaller, more connected place, but someone has to pay the bills some way.
Can Facebook really unify messaging across platforms such as mobile, social and email without most of their member’s heads exploding? If so, they’ve got a marketing channel to offer that may make all past mediums pale by comparison for flexibility, power and reach. It’s no slam dunk, but the game just got a whole lot more interesting.
As Loren McDonald points out in his blog today, the one certainty is that this development and the announcement of “Project Phoenix” from AOL email, assures us of of email address changes and list churn.
What do you think?
Blog coverage
Facebook Messaging: So, what’s wrong with email?
Email Marketing Reports: Actually, Facebook changes everything (and nothing)
Blue Sky Factory: Facebook Messages: Email Marketing Analysis
Direct Mag: What You Need to Know About Facebook’s New Messaging Platform
Mashable: The New Facebook Messages: A Walkthrough [SCREENSHOTS]
Marketing Vox: 10 Ways for E-mail Marketers to Survive Facebook Messages
EmailBlog.eu: Facebook launches new multichannel Messages system
Loren McDonald of Silverpop: Are You Ready for a Flood of Email Address Changes?
Sendlabs: Staying Alive: Email Marketing Industry Still A-OK After Facebook Messaging Announcement
AllFacebook.com: Facebook Vs Gmail: Would They Switch? [Results]
Pure360: Facebook vs Google, AOL, Yahoo and everyone else
Splash Of The Titan Part 3 – Facebook’s New Email Offering
AdvertisingAge: Facebook Email Move Challenges Google, Yahoo, Microsoft
Mashable: Facebook Announces New Messaging System: “It’s Not E-mail”
Tech Crunch: Facebook’s Modern Messaging System: Seamless, History, And A Social Inbox
Sharon Mostyn
November 15, 2010 at 2:28 pmThank you for a clear, concise write up of Facebook email along with aggregating the blog posts from other email leaders, Jim! With all of the buzz surrounding the Facebook Titan email project launch it’s nice to have a single place to get all of the news I need on the greatest thing since Google Wave, um, I mean…well, you know what I mean!
Thanks again,
Sharon
@sharonmostyn
Sharon Mostyn
November 15, 2010 at 2:28 pmThank you for a clear, concise write up of Facebook email along with aggregating the blog posts from other email leaders, Jim! With all of the buzz surrounding the Facebook Titan email project launch it’s nice to have a single place to get all of the news I need on the greatest thing since Google Wave, um, I mean…well, you know what I mean!
Thanks again,
Sharon
@sharonmostyn
Jim Ducharme
November 15, 2010 at 3:07 pmThanks Sharon!
I have to admit that “Wave” also crossed my mind! I really think this was inevitable from Facebook. I’m sure it’s got the deliverability people pacing back and forth and I’m not so sure FB has considered fully how that may drain their resources or if they even care.
I’m going to stock up on pop corn. Things are going to get interesting.
Regards,
jim
Jim Ducharme
November 15, 2010 at 3:07 pmThanks Sharon!
I have to admit that “Wave” also crossed my mind! I really think this was inevitable from Facebook. I’m sure it’s got the deliverability people pacing back and forth and I’m not so sure FB has considered fully how that may drain their resources or if they even care.
I’m going to stock up on pop corn. Things are going to get interesting.
Regards,
jim
Remy Bergsma
November 15, 2010 at 3:50 pmIf usage goes well (uptake is large, let’s say 10 million or more) and Facebook doesn’t alienate users by tweaking too much, this could be a winner. Compared to Google Wave it’s not completely new: just combining channels in your Facebook. There’ll have been people waiting for this, others who are curious and more others who completely don’t care and like their channels separated. Me, I’m in the middle group: both professionally and personally speaking. We’ll find out soon enough if it gets a rolling start or not.
Remy Bergsma
November 15, 2010 at 3:50 pmIf usage goes well (uptake is large, let’s say 10 million or more) and Facebook doesn’t alienate users by tweaking too much, this could be a winner. Compared to Google Wave it’s not completely new: just combining channels in your Facebook. There’ll have been people waiting for this, others who are curious and more others who completely don’t care and like their channels separated. Me, I’m in the middle group: both professionally and personally speaking. We’ll find out soon enough if it gets a rolling start or not.
Andrew Kordek
November 15, 2010 at 10:38 pmThanks for this Jim, but my chief concern with all of this is privacy. We all know that FB is a privacy train wreck and at one point will our privacy be breached or sold or bought. I am not convinced nor am I jumping up and down for FB to see and store all that I do and interact with all of my communications.
I am not sold yet and I am waiting for my invite, so I can play with this shiny new toy.
Andrew
Jim Ducharme
November 16, 2010 at 7:35 amI agree Andrew that FB has a history which should dictate caution for all potential adopters. However, I do like the vision they described for this new offering. It may not be a leap to a new destination, but a step in the right direction.
Regards,
jim
Andrew Kordek
November 15, 2010 at 10:38 pmThanks for this Jim, but my chief concern with all of this is privacy. We all know that FB is a privacy train wreck and at one point will our privacy be breached or sold or bought. I am not convinced nor am I jumping up and down for FB to see and store all that I do and interact with all of my communications.
I am not sold yet and I am waiting for my invite, so I can play with this shiny new toy.
Andrew
Jim Ducharme
November 16, 2010 at 7:35 amI agree Andrew that FB has a history which should dictate caution for all potential adopters. However, I do like the vision they described for this new offering. It may not be a leap to a new destination, but a step in the right direction.
Regards,
jim
Add a comment